Legal Opinion
L. W. & P. Armstrong, Inc. v. The Mormacmar
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 30, 1950PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEDINA, District Judge.
This matter is before me on exceptions to the report of a Special Commissioner, appointed for the purpose of determining the damages suffered by libellant following a decision on the merits in libellant’s favor rendered on October 31, 1947. In my earlier opinion, reported in The Mormacmar, D.C., 75 F.Supp. 520, I held that, because of the expiration of the contractual and statutory period of limitation upon such liability prior to the commencement of the action, the respondents, were not liable for loss or damage to libellant’s property. However, I found respondents…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Luckenbach v. W. J. McCahan Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Deming & Co. v. Merchants' Cotton-press, etc., Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1891
- Mills v. Merchants' Cotton-Press Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1890
- MormacmarDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1947
3Cited by5 opinions
- L. W. & P. Armstrong, Inc. v. The MormacmarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Elia Salzman Tobacco Co. v. Ss MormacwindCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Elia Salzman Tobacco Co. v. SS MormacwindCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Isbrandtsen Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953
- L. W. & P. Armstrong, Inc. v. The MormacmarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952