Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Butterbaugh

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1884No. 10,831PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Erom the Wabash Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

On June 12th, 1876, Catherine Swihart, widow of John Swihart, deceased, commenced an action for partition in the Wabash Circuit Court against the seved children and only heirs of said decedent. The defendants in that action were duly served with process and appeared by attorney or guardian ad litem. At the September term of the court in 1876, a partition of the land was ordered, and commis*404sioners were appointed for that purpose. At the following term the commissioners reported partition in favor of the widow, •setting off to her in severalty one-third in value of the land. .As to the residue…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Milligan v. PooleIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Clark v. StephensonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Elston v. PiggottIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. A. Kiefer Drug Co. v. DeLayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Huffman v. DarlingIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Shafer v. Buckeye State Building & Loan Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1942
  5. Brown v. OwenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API