Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Pruitt

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 1973PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHATTIN, Justice.

Appellants have appealed from an adverse decree of the Chancellor awarding appellee workmen’s compensation benefits for temporary total disability from October 16, 1971, until June 1, 1972, and permanent partial disability of fifty per cent to the body as a whole.

Appellants operate a wholesale produce business in Murfreesboro and deliver produce to their customers by trucks in certain Middle Tennessee towns. Trucks are loaded and dispatched over various routes in the early morning hours of the day. Drivers assist in loading the trucks and then deliver the produce to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hartwell Motor Co., Inc. v. HickersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. General Shale Products Corp. v. CaseyTennessee Supreme Court · 1957
  4. RE Butts Company v. PowellTennessee Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Yates v. Superior Supply Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bacon v. Sevier CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Forest Products v. ParvinTennessee Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API