Legal Opinion

Mattos v. Agarano

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 17, 2011No. 08-15567, 08-35526PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

661 F.3d 433 (2011)

Troy MATTOS; Jayzel Mattos, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

Darren AGARANO; Ryan Aikala; Stuart Kunioka; Halayudha MacKnight, Defendants-Appellants, and

Maui County, Defendant.

Malaika Brooks, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

City of Seattle, Defendant, and

Steven L. Daman, in his capacity as an officer of the Seattle Police Department; Donald M. Jones, in his individual capacity as an officer of the Seattle Police Department; Juan M. Ornelas, in his individual capacity as an officer of the Seattle Police Department, Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 08-15567, 08-35526.

United States Court of Appeals,…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jones v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. Koistra v. Cnty. of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2018
  3. (PC) Allen v. BotkinDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  4. (PC) Gregory E. Shehee (Civil Detainee) v. ReddingDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  5. (PC) Rico v. DucartDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API