Legal Opinion
Bonhomme v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 24, 2025No. 4:24-cv-07998Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DESMOND BONHOMME, et al., Case No. 24-cv-07998-JST 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 9 v. COMPEL ARBITRATION AND STAY PROCEEDINGS 10 UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Re: ECF No. 12 Defendant. 11 12 13 Before the Court is Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc.’s motion to compel arbitration and 14 stay proceedings. ECF No. 12. The Court will grant the motion. 15 I. BACKGROUND 16 Plaintiffs Desmond Bonhomme and Daniel Tyler bring this putative class action against 17 Uber for alleged violations of New York City Administrative…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Kevin Nguyen v. Barnes & Noble Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.