Legal Opinion

Pulleyblank v. Mason County Road Commission

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1957No. Docket 17, Calendar 46,578PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The question here is whether a certain .road is public or private. We are getting these cases in increasing numbers recently. As the cities spill ■over into the country, as forested area and lakes ■come under private control, a conflict of interest is generated: The inhabitants of the surrounding .area do not relish having their formerly-used roads or trails blocked off with barriers or chains. The new owners do not want trespassers, berrypick-•ers, fishermen, and just plain sightseers making free with their premises. Thus the setting of the conflict. 'The problem is not new, rather the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Crosby v. City of GreenvilleMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Missaukee Lakes Land Co. v. Missaukee County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Rice v. Clare County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Chapman v. City of Sault Ste. MarieMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  5. South Branch Ranch Co. v. EmeryMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Beulah Hoagland Appleton Qualified Personal Residence Trust v. Emmet County Road CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Kraus v. Gerrish TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Eyde Bros. Development Co. v. Roscommon County Board of Road CommissionersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Indian Club v. Lake County Road CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Miller v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API