Pulleyblank v. Mason County Road Commission
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
The question here is whether a certain .road is public or private. We are getting these cases in increasing numbers recently. As the cities spill ■over into the country, as forested area and lakes ■come under private control, a conflict of interest is generated: The inhabitants of the surrounding .area do not relish having their formerly-used roads or trails blocked off with barriers or chains. The new owners do not want trespassers, berrypick-•ers, fishermen, and just plain sightseers making free with their premises. Thus the setting of the conflict. 'The problem is not new, rather the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Crosby v. City of GreenvilleMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Missaukee Lakes Land Co. v. Missaukee County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
- Rice v. Clare County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- Chapman v. City of Sault Ste. MarieMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- South Branch Ranch Co. v. EmeryMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Beulah Hoagland Appleton Qualified Personal Residence Trust v. Emmet County Road CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- Kraus v. Gerrish TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
- Eyde Bros. Development Co. v. Roscommon County Board of Road CommissionersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
- Indian Club v. Lake County Road CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
- Miller v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.