Legal Opinion

Parrotte v. Dryden

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 1905No. 13,570PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Buffalo county: John E. Thompson, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBarnes, J.

This action was commenced in the distinct court for Buffalo county, on the 13th day of May, 1901, by Mary H. Parrotte and her husband, Marcus L. Parrotte, against John N. Dryden, Lewis P. Main and others, to obtain a new trial in an action in which a judgment had been rendered against them on the 16th day of February, 1898, and to restrain said Dryden and Main, and one Funk, as sheriff, from interfering with their alleged possession of certain land situated in said county. At a later date an amended petition was filed, to which Dryden and Main answered by way of cross-petition. Proper…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Alley v. NottSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Lamb v. McConkeySupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  3. Brown v. KirkbrideSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
  4. Dryden v. ParrotteNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Oregonian Ry. Co. v. Oregon Ry. & Nav. Co.United States Circuit Court · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Aguilera v. Pérez LugoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1937
  2. Woodard v. OutlandCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
  3. Aguilera v. PérezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API