Legal Opinion

Woodard v. Outland

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 12, 1929No. 8612PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOOTH, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an order barring appellant, plaintiff below, from further prosecuting an action at law. The sinuosities of practice leading up to the order were in substance as follows: The suit was brought upon a verbal contract covering the drilling of certain wells upon lands held by plaintiff under leases. The.petition set out the contract as follows:

“As a result of said negotiations, on or about the 7th day of December, 1921, at Dewey, Oklahoma, it was verbally agreed between plaintiff and defendant that the defendant would raise the necessary money to be used…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Aurora City v. WestSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Gould v. Evansville & Crawfordsville R. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. SlaghtSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Bissell v. Spring Valley TownshipSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Alley v. NottSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brooks v. Arkansas-Louisiana Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
  2. Warren Company v. NeelDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1968
  3. Anderson v. AbbottDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1945
  4. McAllister v. SloanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API