Sackman v. Liggett Group, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BOYLE, United States Magistrate Judge.
This is a diversity action. The plaintiffs, Janet and Joseph Sackman (hereinafter called the “Sackmans”), are citizens of New York. The defendant tobacco company, The Liggett Group, Inc. (hereinafter called “Liggett”) is a Delaware corporation. The Sack-mans are suing Liggett for damages resulting from the cancer plaintiff Janet Sackman suffered, allegedly caused by her use of Liggett’s product, Chesterfield cigarettes.
Currently before this court is the determination of the applicability of several privi leges asserted by…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Haines v. Liggett Group Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Burton v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1997
- E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Forma-Pack, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Glidden Co. v. JandernoaDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1997
- Burton v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1997
- Burton v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.