Legal Opinion

Eversdyk v. Wyoming City Council

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 8, 1988No. Docket 95973PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoctoroff, J.

Plaintiff appeals as of right from the trial court’s order that denied his motions for summary disposition on Count i of his complaint, MCR 2.116(C)(9) and (10), granted defendants’ counter-motion for summary disposition on Count i, and granted his motion for summary disposition on Count n. We reverse.

This action arises out of plaintiff’s proposed plat development of a sixteen-acre parcel of land in Wyoming, Michigan. The parcel of property is currently zoned by the City of Wyoming as R-2 single family residential. In the spring of 1986, the plaintiff submitted a preliminary plat plan to the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rizzo v. KretschmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Durant v. StahlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Toan v. McGinnMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Huff v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Carlson v. City of TroyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Altman v. Meridian TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Altman v. Meridian TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Cole’s Home & Land Co, LLC v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API