Eversdyk v. Wyoming City Council
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtDoctoroff, J.
Plaintiff appeals as of right from the trial court’s order that denied his motions for summary disposition on Count i of his complaint, MCR 2.116(C)(9) and (10), granted defendants’ counter-motion for summary disposition on Count i, and granted his motion for summary disposition on Count n. We reverse.
This action arises out of plaintiff’s proposed plat development of a sixteen-acre parcel of land in Wyoming, Michigan. The parcel of property is currently zoned by the City of Wyoming as R-2 single family residential. In the spring of 1986, the plaintiff submitted a preliminary plat plan to the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rizzo v. KretschmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
- Durant v. StahlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Toan v. McGinnMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Huff v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Carlson v. City of TroyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Altman v. Meridian TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
- Altman v. Meridian TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
- Cole’s Home & Land Co, LLC v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006