Altman v. Meridian Township
Michigan Supreme Court
1DissentRiley, J.
This case arises out of the rejection by defendants township and township *643board of a plat submitted by plaintiffs-developer. Because I believe that the township lacked authority to reject the plat pursuant, to the Subdivision Control Act, I would affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals reversing the grant of summary disposition in favor of defendants and remanding to the trial court.
I dissent from my colleagues because SCA § 182(4)(a)1 provides for rejection by the governing body of a plat that "is isolated from or which isolates other lands from existing public streets, unless suitable…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Arrowhead Development Co. v. Livingston County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Carlson v. City of TroyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
- Eyde Construction Co. v. Charter Township of MeridianMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- CPW Investments 2 v. City of TroyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- Eversdyk v. Wyoming City CouncilMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.