Legal Opinion

Reese v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 17, 2011No. A11A0443PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFADDEN, Judge.

A jury found Kuwanza Reese not guilty of possessing cocaine with intent to distribute, but guilty of possessing cocaine with intent to distribute near a public housing project. Reese filed a motion in arrest of judgment, arguing that the inconsistent verdicts are repugnant and require an acquittal on all charges. The trial court denied the motion, and Reese appeals. Because Georgia law does not prohibit inconsistent criminal verdicts, we affirm.

According to Reese, the “not guilty” verdict on the cocaine possession charge precluded a guilty verdict as to possession of cocaine…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Milam v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  2. Coleman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  3. Artis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  4. English v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
  2. Chernard Carter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API