Legal Opinion

California Shipbuilding Corp. v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1947No. L. A. No. 20142PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

Respondent Frank Cornier sustained compensable injuries while in the employ of petitioner California Shipbuilding Corporation. He claimed and respondent commission awarded the increased compensation provided by sec*279tion 4553 of the Labor Code for an employe injured by reason of the serious and wilful misconduct of an employer. To sustain the extra compensation, it must be established that the employer’s misconduct is both serious and wilful (27 Cal.Jur. 441, § 118) and, where the employer is a corporation, such misconduct, before it can be attributed to the corporation, must be proved to be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Western Indemnity Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. California Shipbuilding Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mercer - Fraser Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. California Shipbuilding Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. R. L. Keeley v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. California Shipbuilding Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Coborn v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API