Coborn v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Supreme Court
1Concurrence
*718CARTER, J.
I am constrained to concur in the judgment of affirmance because; and only because, I am convinced there is some evidence in the record which tends to support the finding of the commission that petitioner was only partially dependent on deceased at the time of the latter’s injury and death. While there is, in my opinion, ample evidence to support a finding of total dependency, there is also some evidence of partial dependency. In this state of the record we are required to sustain the finding of partial dependency and affirm the award.
It is not the function of an appellate court to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Unemployment Compensation Comm'n of Alaska v. AragonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Cardillo v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.