Legal Opinion

Hahn v. . Fletcher

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 3, 1925PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarksON, J.

Constitution of North Carolina, Art. IV, sec. 27, in part, is as fojllows: “The several justices of tbe peace shall have jurisdiction, under such regulations as the General Assembly shall prescribe, of civil actions founded on contract, wherein the sum demanded shall not exceed two hundred dollars, and wherein the title to real estate shall not he in controversy ” etc. C. S., 1473.

The sole question involved in this appeal is whether under the 'facts found the “title to real estate” is in controversy. If the title is in controversy, the justice of the peace had no jurisdiction and the action…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jones v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. Murphy v. . McNeillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  3. Gammon v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  4. Kinston v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  5. Barrett v. . BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kinston v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  2. Town of Saluda v. County of PolkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  3. City of Washington v. HodgesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. Farrow v. American Eagle Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. Tucker v. . AlmondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API