Legal Opinion

Tucker v. . Almond

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 22, 1936PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

The question involved: Do judgments entered against administrators, as set out in the agreed statement of facts, create an encumbrance on land conveyed by deed prior to his death, when deed is not recorded until after the judgments are docketed against the administrator? "We do not think the judgments against the administrator, under the facts and circumstances of this case, were encumbrances against the land in controversy.

In the agreed facts, section 12, is the following: “That in said deed executed by the said G. F. Almond and wife to R. J. Tucker, the said Almond and wife covenanted with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Eaton v. . DoubSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Dunn v. . Barnes, Adm'rSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
  3. Hahn v. . FletcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brown v. GreenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API