Legal Opinion

Sanders v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided September 12, 1991No. 01-89-01086-CRPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DUGGAN, Justice.

A jury convicted appellant of theft by receiving stolen property in an amount greater than $750 but less than $20,000. Appellant pleaded true to two enhancement allegations in the indictment, and the court assessed punishment at 28 years confinement. We reverse and remand.

In his first point of error, appellant asserts that the trial court erred in overruling his motion for instructed verdict because the evidence was insufficient to show that the fair market value of the stolen property was greater than $750, an essential element of the State’s proof.

The indictment…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Moreno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  3. Arline v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Hayes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  5. Sullivan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1994
  2. Hutcheson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1995
  3. Gemoets v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
  4. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2010
  5. Juan Ismael Sanchez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API