Legal Opinion

State v. Prince

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1948No. 5054PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COMPTON, Justice.

Defendant in error was charged by an information containing two counts, based upon Section 41-4519, New Mexico Statutes, 1941 Compilation, which reads as follows : “Any person being in the possession of the property of another, who shall convert such property to his own use, or dispose of such property in any way not authorized by the owner thereof, or by law, shall be guilty of embezzlement * * * ” Sec. 2, Ch. 70, Laws 1923, N.M.Sts.

The information charged:

“That in the county of Bernalillo, State of New Mexico, the said Lewis Prince, being entrusted in the possession of…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Tyson & Brother v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Swafford v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Bradbury & Stamm Construction Co. v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  3. State v. HinesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State v. StoehrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State of Oregon v. WojahnOregon Supreme Court · 1955

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API