Legal Opinion

Smith v. Cudahy Packing Co.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided March 14, 1946No. Civil Action No. 935PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DONOVAN, District Judge.

This action was commenced by plaintiff pursuant to the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq., to recover $5,000,000. It is a companion case to the suit entitled Schempf, Plaintiff, v. Armour & Co., Defendant, D.C., 5 F.R.D. 294.

The complaint in this case is identical to that in the case of Schempf v. Armour & Co., except as to the parties, employees named and amount of recovery sought. Preliminary proceedings similar to those in the Schempf case were initiated by defendant for the purpose of discovery and production by plaintiff of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schempf v. Armour & Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1946

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smith v. Cudahy Packing Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API