Ex parte Sims
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1DissentDouglas, Judge
Overruling many cases which held that the judgment in a habeas corpus proceeding must be affirmed in the absence of a statement of facts, the majority abates this appeal because there was no compliance with Article 44.34, V.A.C.C.P. The rule of those cases was considered to be so well established that no reasoning or citation of statutory authority was required. See e.g., Ex parte Naill, 127 S.W. 1031 (Tex.Cr.App. 1910); Ex parte Palmer, 136 Tex.Cr.R. 245, 124 S.W.2d 860 (1939); Ex parte Moore, 318 S.W.2d 667 (Tex.Cr.App.1958); and Ex parte Kindell, 415 S.W.2d 922 (Tex.Cr.App.1967). Their…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Boulware v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Warren v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1948
- Cameron v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.