Legal Opinion

Lance v. Mann

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 28, 1945No. Appeal, 152PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Horace Stern,

We have here the not unfamiliar problem of applying the provisions of a contract to a situation which the parties did not contemplate at the time they entered into the agreement. In such a case the solution must be sought from a study of the surrounding circumstances, the situation of the parties, the objects they apparently had in view, and the nature of the subject-matter of the contract: Slonaker v. P. C. Publishing Co., 338 Pa. 292, 296, 13 A. 2d 48, 50, 51; Hindman v. Forren, 353 Pa. 33, 35, 44 A. 2d 241, 242.

On June 12, 1942, plaintiff and defendant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Slonaker v. P. G. Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Hindman v. FarrenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lance v. MannSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. DeMoss v. Beryllium Corp. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API