Legal Opinion

DeMoss v. Beryllium Corp. of Pennsylvania

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 8, 1948No. Appeal, 57PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Horace Stern,

The question is whether two letters set forth in the complaint constitute a contract between the parties.

The first was addressed by plaintiff’s decedent, George B. DeMoss, to The Beryllium Corporation of Pennsylvania, defendant, and was as follows: “We agree to machine, as per your drawing dated March 3, 1943, one hundred thousand (100,000) or more small airplane bushings at the rate of 62^S per bushing. . . . Bushings are to be furnished us in sufficient quantities to maintain our production without interruption. . . .” To this defendant replied:…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Slonaker v. P. G. Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Harrington-Wiard Co. v. Blomstrom Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Hindman v. FarrenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. Barron G. Collier, Inc. v. KindySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  5. Central-Penn National Bank v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. M & R Contractors & Builders, Inc. v. MichaelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  2. Honeywell, Inc. v. American Standards Testing Bureau, Inc. v. Aetna Life & Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  3. Lambert v. Durallium Products Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Mascaro v. Snelling & Snelling of Baltimore, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  5. Ford v. American Express Financial Advisors, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API