Legal Opinion

Security Union Casualty Co. v. Hunt

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 27, 1927No. 2825PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRandodph, J.

The following is a substantial statement of the evidence introduced in the trial of this case:

Adams, Brown, and McAlister owned a 160-acre oil and gas lease and also owned a drilling rig. Bridwell and Mayfield agreed with the Adams firm to drill a well on this lease, in return for which they were to have assigned to them, by Adams, Brown, and Mc-Alister, a one-half’ interest in said lease. While the assignment of the one-half interest in the lease was delivered to Mayfield, it was so delivered with the understanding that, if Bridwell and Mayfield did not pay the expenses of the drilling of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Maryland Casualty Co. v. ScruggsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  2. Texas Employers' Ins. v. ShillingTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  3. Saner-Ragley Lumber Co. v. SpiveyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  4. Payne v. Texas Mercantile Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  5. Continental Gin Co. v. Gardner.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. HarringtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. Southern Underwriters v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  3. Travelers Insurance Company v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  4. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. HarringtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API