Legal Opinion · Dissent

Willard v. PARSONS HILL PARTNERSHIP

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 5, 2005No. 03-494 and 03-499Published

1Dissent

Dooley, J.,

¶ 48. dissenting. Plaintiffs in this case seek redress for their landlord’s failure to notify them of chemical contamination, that the landlord knew about, in the water serving their residences. Although plaintiffs alleged a number of claims arising from the landlord’s inaction, they decided to pursue only their warranty-of-habitability claim in the superior court. Obviously sympathetic to plaintiffs’ situation, the majority holds that the Legislature did not intend the Vermont Residential Rental Agreements Act (RRAA), 9 V.S.A., chapter 137, to cover latent defects known to the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Tarrant v. Department of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  2. Colwell v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  3. Hilder v. St. PeterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
  4. Swett v. Haig's, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  5. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API