Fairce v. Amrine
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Harvey, J.:
This is an original proceeding in habeas corpus. The petitioner alleged that he is being illegally held and deprived of his liberty by respondent under an unlawful judgment, -sentence and commitment of the district court of Wyandotte county, which is repugnant to the United States constitution and bill of rights and void, for the reasons: (1) That he was denied benefit of counsel; (2) denied due process of law; (3) convicted on unsworn hearsay evidence; (4) forced to give testimony against himself; (5) that the rights to habeas corpus are…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re MoteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- Loftis v. AmrineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hill v. HudspethSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946
- Engels v. AmrineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
- Garrison v. AmrineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
- Brewer v. AmrineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
- Crisp v. HudspethSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.