Deemer v. Falkenburg
New Mexico Supreme Court
Appeal from Sierra district court.
1Opinion of the CourtBrinker, J.
This was an action of ejectment for a town lot in Kingston. Plaintiff recovered judgment below. In this court appellee moves to dismiss because appellant failed to file an assignment of errors on the first day of the term, as provided by section 2189, Oomp. Laws. On the first day of the term appellant filed a printed brief, signed by counsel, on the last page of which, and after the signature of counsel, appears an assignment of errors, also signed by counsel. Without determining whether this is sufficient under thestatute, we hold that appellee cannot take advantage of it, because he has…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Coryell v. CainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Burling v. ThompkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Low v. SettleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1889
- Kelley v. McKeonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
- Winter v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- White v. MontoyaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
- In Re Estate of DuranNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
- Madrid v. RodriguezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
- Currier v. GonzalesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Lawson v. SernaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.