Legal Opinion

State v. Schroeder

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 30, 1890PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Case certified, after verdict of guilty, from the district court for Otter Tail county, Baxter, J., presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

The defendant was convicted of selling at the village of Henning, in Otter Tail county, intoxicating liquor, to wit, beer, in a quantity less than five gallons, without having first obtained a license from the village council. The undisputed evidence showed that defendant, a brewer, was engaged in the manufacture of beer at Perham in the same county. This beer was put in small four-gallon kegs, and shipped to Henning, where he had a store-house, in charge of an agent, where. the beer was kept for sale. The beer was sold only by the keg. The sale in question consisted of a sale of one of these…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. BenzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  2. State v. SchroederSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  3. State v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API