Legal Opinion

State v. Benz

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 7, 1889PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Case certified from the district court for Bamsey county, by Brill, J., pursuant to Gen. St. 1878, c. 117, § 11.

1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.

The defendant was indicted for selling spirituous liquor — one pint of whiskey — without a license. The cause was .submitted to the district court upon an agreed statement of the facts, a jury trial being waived. The court, having found the defendant guilty, certified the case to this court for review upon the questions ■of law involved. The defendant is a wholesale liquor dealer. He does not sell liquor to be drunk on the premises where sold. He does sell in small quantities, — as a pint, quart, etc., — at his place of business, to others than liquor dealers, but only in sealed packages. He…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. OrthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. SchroederSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  2. State v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API