Legal Opinion

Charter v. United States Department of Agriculture

District Court, D. Montana

Decided November 1, 2002No. Cause CV 00-198-BLG-RFCPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

CEBULL, District Judge.

FACTS

This case arose when the Petitioners refused' to pay beef checkoff assessments pursuant to The Beef Promotion and Research Act. The Petitioners produce grass-fed beef that is free of hormones, subther-aputic antibiotics, chemical additives, extra water, and irradiation. (Pet. Statement of Uncontroverted Facts ¶ 6). They object to the checkoff-funded program because they are compelled to fund advertisements which do not differentiate between their product and other beef products. On April 26, 2000 Administrative Law Judge Dorthea A. Baker ordered the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Roberts v. United States JayceesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Rosenberger v. Rector & Visitors of University of VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Avocados Plus Inc v. Veneman, Ann M.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
  2. Summit Medical Center of Alabama, Inc. v. RileyDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2003
  3. Livestock Marketing Ass'n v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  4. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. BontaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2003
  5. Pelts & Skins, L.L.C. v. JenkinsDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API