Legal Opinion
Care and Treatment of Schottel v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided December 16, 2003No. WD 61683PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LISA WHITE HARDWICK, Judge.
Wilbur Schottel appeals the denial of his Petition for Release and Motion to Withdraw Stipulation related to his status as a sexually violent predator. We affirm.
Factual and Procedural History
In 1995, Wilbur Schottel pled guilty to a charge of sodomy, Section 566.060 RSMo. 1994, and subsequently served a prison sentence from November 16, 1995, until February 28, 2000. Upon his release from prison, the State filed a petition in probate court to detain Schottel for evaluation as a sexually violent predator (“SVP”). Schot-tel waived trial on the petition and stipulated…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kansas v. CraneSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- State Ex Rel. Chastain v. City of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Care & Treatment of Barlow v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- State ex rel. RAS Investment, Inc. v. LandonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
3Cited by5 opinions
- Care and Treatment of Schottel v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
- Inman v. Missouri Department of CorrectionsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- State Ex Rel. Goodman v. ST. LOUIS BD. OF POLICE COMM'NMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- State ex rel. Goodman v. St. Louis Board of Police CommissionersMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- Gibson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004