Legal Opinion
In re Marco N.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 15, 2011PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the presentment agency (see Matter of David H., 69 NY2d 792, 793 [1987]; Matter of Ashley P., 74 AD3d 1075 [2010]; Matter of Joel C., 70 AD3d 936, 937 [2010]; cf People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]), we find that it is was legally sufficient to establish, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of robbery in the second degree, grand larceny in the fourth degree, and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree based on a theory of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- Matter of H.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
- In re Ashley P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re Kenyetta F.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re Akanilli E.D.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re Akanilli E.D.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013