Legal Opinion

In re Kenyetta F.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 4, 2008PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*541The appellant approached the complainant on a city street and detained him with questions, thereby enabling other individuals to beat him and steal his property. During this incident, the appellant did nothing to intervene or summon help. She then fled with the attackers.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the presentment agency (see Matter of David H., 69 NY2d 792, 793 [1987]; Matter of Jonathan D., 33 AD3d 996 [2006]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish that the appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted robbery in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Matter of H.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. In re Joseph J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. In re Aida S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. In re Justice G.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  5. In re Jonathan V.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. In re Summer D.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. In re Brooklyn B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. In re Daqwan J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. In re Joseph H.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. In re Geovanny V.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API