Legal Opinion

State v. Keesee

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided July 28, 1997No. 2707PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GOOLSBY, Judge.

Robert Keesee was convicted and fined for hunting in a wildlife management area without the required permit. We affirm.

While patrolling Wildlife Management Area (WMA) land in Fairfield County in December 1995, a Department of Natural Resources (DNR) officer happened upon Keesee and a companion hunting on the land. Keesee produced a Catawba Indian’s hunting license, which was a “combination type license, hunting and fishing.” The officer asked Keesee where his WMA permit was. Keesee told the officer he did not need a WMA license in light of his Catawba combination license. The…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. BlackmonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. City of Columbia v. American Civil Liberties Union of South Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  3. Burns v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  4. State v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  5. Singletary v. South Carolina Department of EducationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. KeeseeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API