State v. Keesee
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
GOOLSBY, Judge.
Robert Keesee was convicted and fined for hunting in a wildlife management area without the required permit. We affirm.
While patrolling Wildlife Management Area (WMA) land in Fairfield County in December 1995, a Department of Natural Resources (DNR) officer happened upon Keesee and a companion hunting on the land. Keesee produced a Catawba Indian’s hunting license, which was a “combination type license, hunting and fishing.” The officer asked Keesee where his WMA permit was. Keesee told the officer he did not need a WMA license in light of his Catawba combination license. The…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. BlackmonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- City of Columbia v. American Civil Liberties Union of South Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- Burns v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- Singletary v. South Carolina Department of EducationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. KeeseeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999