State v. Brown
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Toal, Justice:
Appellant, George Brown (Brown), appeals his conviction for possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute. Brown claims the provision in S.C. Code Ann. § 44-53-375 (Supp. 1991) of higher penalties for possession with intent to distribute crack cocaine than are provided for cocaine in other forms violates the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the United States Constitution. We disagree and affirm.
FACTS
In July 1990, police began conducting a video surveillance of Brown’s apartment. As a result of the activity observed on the videotapes, the police obtained a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. SimsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- State v. CrenshawSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
- Brown v. County of HorrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Caprood v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Commonwealth v. RosarioMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
- State v. HicksSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- State v. PriceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- State v. CurtisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.