Legal Opinion

Flori Corp. v. Fitzgerald

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 30, 1990No. 2 CA-CV 90-0061PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FERNANDEZ, Chief Judge.

Appellants John and Ann Fitzgerald appeal from the trial court’s rulings that the applicable statute of limitations on a continuing personal guaranty is six years, that *602appellants’ filing of bankruptcy proceedings did not terminate the guaranties at issue, and that the guaranties were not defective. We affirm.

Appellee Flori Corporation (formerly known as Electrical Equipment Company) is a wholesale distributor of, among other things, Zenith television products. John and Ann Fitzgerald are the officers of John P. Fitzgerald, Inc., dba Fitzgerald Color T.V. King…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re SafrenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1986
  2. Hofmann Company v. MeisnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  3. Bomud Co. v. Yockey Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  4. Bank of New England, N.A. v. KleinDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1988

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Provident National Assurance Co. v. SbroccaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  2. Mill Alley Partners v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  3. Monroe v. Az AcreageCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  4. Broadband v. SatcomCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  5. Pravati Capital III Funding, LP and Alexander Chucri v. Law Offices of Phillippe and Associates, P.C., a Texas Professional Corporation, and Christopher L. Phillippe, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API