Legal Opinion

Bolden v. Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 23, 1898PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Civil action for damages for personal injury received through the alleged negligence of defendant tried before Robinson, J., at February Term, 1898, of the Superior Court of Guilford Oohnty.

Read the full summary

Civil action for damages for personal injury received through the alleged negligence of defendant tried before Robinson, J., at February Term, 1898, of the Superior Court of Guilford Oohnty. The plaintiff was a bridge watchman in the service of ■ the defendant company, and was seriously .injured by a fall through the bridge while spacing up a cross-tie, apparently sound but was defective, and broke in two with his weight and the blows from a hammer he was using for the purpose. The plaintiff was the only witness who testified — his evidence is substantially stated in the opinion. . At the…

1Opinion of the Court

Douglas, J.:

This is an action for damages for personal injuries received by the plaintiff through the alleged negligence of the defendant.

The only evidence in this case was that of the plaintiff, who testified substantially, as follows:

That he was a watchman for the Southern Railway Company at a bridge over Reedy Fork, in August or December, 1895, that one Reister was the .bridge builder of the defendant, under the “supervision” of the bridge department of the Southern Railway Company, that Bolden was under the control of the said Reister as a watchman. That Reister began to repair the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hough v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Northern Pacific Railroad v. HerbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Chesson v. John L. Roper Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1896

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ball v. GussenhovenMontana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Mercer v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. Dorsett v. Clement-Ross Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  4. Cummings v. Helena & Livingston Smelting & Reduction Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Lloyd v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API