Legal Opinion
McNaughton-McKay Electric Co. v. Andrich
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided November 25, 1996No. 2593PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
HOWARD, Judge:
McNaughton-McKay Electric Co. of NC, Inc. (McNaughton) sued Peter A. Andrich (Andrich) d/b/a Carolina Advanced Technologies, Inc. (C.A.T.) for failure to pay a debt. The trial court granted McNaughton’s motion for summary judgment because an earlier bankruptcy proceeding determined Andrich *278owed the debt. Andrich appeals. We affirm as modified and remand.1
I. FACTS
Andrich was the president of C.A.T., a now dissolved South Carolina corporation. C.A.T. ordered equipment from McNaughton. After C.A.T. failed to pay the debt, McNaughton sued Andrich and C.A.T. After filing suit,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- REPUBLIC SUPPLY CO., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph SHOAF, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Southmark Properties and St. Charles Avenue, Inc. v. The Charles House CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Paul v. MontsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Koester v. Carolina Rental Center, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Holmes v. McKayCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999