National Trailer Convoy, Inc. v. United States
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND MEMORANDUM DECISION
Before MURRAH, Circuit Judge, and BOHANON and BARROW, District Judges. MURRAH, Circuit Judge.
When this case was previously before this Court we remanded it to the Interstate Commerce Commission for findings whether the services offered in the contract motor carrier application were “transportation services” within the meaning of the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C. § 303(a) (15). National Trailer Convoy, Inc. v. United States, 227 F.Supp. 730 (N.D.Okl., 1964). Upon remand the Commission, on consideration of the original record and without further…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Garvey v. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- Colorado-Arizona-California Express, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- National Trailer Convoy, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1968
- Niedert Motor Service, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- Mississippi East, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
- Niedert Motor Service, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- Jones Truck Lines, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.