Legal Opinion
King v. Hoadley
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided May 5, 1942PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSherburne, J.
This is an action, brought under P. L. 2687, as amended by sec. 4 of No. 55 of the Acts of 1935, for the purpose of perfecting a lien upon a building and lot of land owned by the defendant, in which the plaintiff alleges that the defendant made a written contract with one Arthur King for excavating a cellar and erecting a house upon such lot; that the plaintiff was -employed by Arthur King upon the job, and has not been paid for labor to the amount of $77.00, performed from October 4 to 18, 1941, which became due October 25, 1941; that the plaintiff and Arthur King ceased working on the job…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Anderson v. SouliereSupreme Court of Vermont · 1930
- Richford Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
- Brace v. HulettSupreme Court of Vermont · 1938
- Wescott v. BriereSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
3Cited by5 opinions
- Town of Colchester v. Hinesburg Sand & Gravel, Inc. (In Re APC Construction, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1990
- Springfield Cooperative Freeze Locker Plant, Inc. v. WigginsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1949
- Cote v. BloomfieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1970
- Carey v. Bourque-Lanigan Post No. 5Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1954
- Nadeau Lumber, Inc. v. BenoitSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981