Legal Opinion

Carey v. Bourque-Lanigan Post No. 5

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 13, 1954PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWebber, J.

The plaintiff is a building contractor. The two principal defendants are for the purposes of this case one entity as their rights and obligations are identical. The parties entered into a single, entire, written contract for the erection of an American Legion building at an agreed price of $129,978. Final payment was conditioned on issuance of a certificate of completion and acceptance by the architect named in the contract. The work was to be substantiálly completed on or before June 30, 1949 “if possible.” Several months after that, defendants discharged the contractor alleging unexcused…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. M. J. Daly & Sons, Inc. v. New Haven Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1917
  2. Susi v. DavisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1935
  3. Levine v. ReynoldsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1947
  4. Hub Construction Co. v. Dudley Wood Works Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  5. Veazie v. City of BangorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1863

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thaxter v. FrySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966
  2. Carey v. CyrSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1955
  3. Durgin v. LewisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API