Legal Opinion
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Rosenfield
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 11, 1988No. 85-6746PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LUDWIG, District Judge.
In this action, State Farm Automobile Insurance Company sued to recover payments made as a result of an allegedly fraudulent automobile accident insurance scheme. Defendants are attorneys David M. Rosenfield 1 and Elliott Raskin and physicians John L. Cionci, Jordan B. Colletta, 2 Frank Caruso, 3 Edward I. Cooper and Armand Castagna. 4 All of the defendants pleaded guilty or were convicted of crimi nal charges. 5 Based on these guilty pleas and convictions, State Farm moved for partial summary judgment against defendants Raskin, Cionci and Castagna as to civil…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Emich Motors Corp. v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. ForsytheCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Jannotti, Harry P. Schwartz, George X. Appeal of Harry P. Jannotti, in No. 83-1093. Appeal of George X. Schwartz, in No. 83-1094Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Rose v. BartleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Scheiner v. WallaceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Corporacion Insular De Seguros v. Reyes MunozDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1994
- Giuliano v. Everything Yogurt, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1993
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Rodco AutobodyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.