Weimer v. Porter
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Clinton. Ejectment. Plaintiffs bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.
The plaintiffs in error sued in ejectment on certain tax titles, and the case being tried by the circuit judge without a jury, he ruled that they were not valid.
The plaintiffs in error then offered evidence to show that they had paid certain taxes assessed against the land subsequent to their tax-titles, and claimed the right to recover therefor on the trial of the ejectment, under Comp. B., § 1131.1 The evidence so offered consisted *570wholly ¡of tax receipts, and on objection the judge refused to receive it. The ruling was correct. Apart from other objections the treasurer’s receipts to the…
2Cited by10 opinions
- O'Neil v. TylerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
- Olson v. PetersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
- Brown v. CorbinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Fidelity Funding Co. v. VaughnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Meriwether v. Board of Com'rsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.