Legal Opinion

Koss Construction v. Caterpillar, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided June 5, 1998No. 78,054PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Royse, J.:

This is a products liability action. Koss Construction Co. (Koss) sued Caterpillar, Inc. (Caterpillar) and Martin Tractor Company, Inc. (Martin) for damages to a Caterpillar roller caused by an allegedly defective part. Caterpillar filed a motion for judgment on die pleadings, which the district court granted. Koss appeals from that decision.

A motion for judgment on the pleadings is based upon the ground that the moving party is entided to a judgment on the face of the pleadings themselves. In considering a defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, the question is whether,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Saratoga Fishing Co. v. J. M. Martinac & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Kansas Public Employees Retirement System v. Reimer & Koger Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  4. Foulk v. Colonial TerraceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1994
  5. Professional Lens Plan, Inc. v. Polaris Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. David v. HettSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  2. Rinehart v. Morton Buildings, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  3. Northwest Arkansas Masonry, Inc. v. Summit Specialty Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2001
  4. Prendiville v. Contemporary Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2004
  5. Gonzalez v. Pepsico, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2007

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API