Legal Opinion

Acquarulo v. Botwinik Bros., Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 28, 1953Published

1Opinion of the Court

139 Conn. 684 (1953)

DOMENICO ACQUARULO

v.

BOTWINIK BROTHERS, INC., ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Argued April 8, 1953.

Decided April 28, 1953.

BROWN, C. J., JENNINGS, BALDWIN, INGLIS and O'SULLIVAN, JS.

Henry T. Istas and George W. Chisaski, for the appellant (plaintiff).

John E. McNerney, with whom, on the brief, was Francis J. Moran, for the appellees (defendants).

JENNINGS, J.

The question to be decided is whether the workmen's compensation commissioner was justified in suspending compensation payments to an injured workman because of his refusal to undergo an operation.

The following findings…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kennerson v. Thames Towboat Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
  2. Glodenis v. American Brass Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  3. Saunders v. New England Collapsible Tube Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  4. Czeplicki v. Fafnir Bearing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  5. Snooks's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API