Legal Opinion

Snooks's Case

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 9, 1928PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.

One who is entitled to compensation under the workmen’s compensation act, G. L. c. 152, cannot claim compensation for existing disability or suffering which can be lessened by resort to the reasonable remedies and operations of the medical and surgical practice of the time and place if these are not attended with serious risk to life or member and if the outcome reasonably to be expected is beneficial. The test is not his willingness to submit to operation, but his right to guard fife and limb from unreasonable peril. We have said in Floccher’s Case, 221 Mass. 54, 55, that if the claimant is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Floccher's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  2. Weir's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Ouillette v. SheerinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  2. Cody v. Insurance Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Cody v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Jefferson Standard Life Insurance v. HurtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  5. Akins's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API