Legal Opinion

Re Thomas Prince Estate

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1926PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion

The services for which General Idleman is asking and has been allowed compensation were rendered to Dr. Ong as executor. For the services Dr. Ong is personally liable to General Idleman. The services are not a direct charge against the estate but constitute a claim against Dr. Ong personally. The executor is allowed to retain from the money of the estate the expenses incurred by him in the administration of the estate, including reasonable attorney fees. The language of the statutes is as follows:

"An executor or administrator shall be allowed, in the settlement of his account, all necessary…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Strong v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Waite v. WillisOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  3. In re Assignment of BankOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Muldrick v. GalbraithOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Re Assignment of WoodallOregon Supreme Court · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Re Thomas Prince EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API