Legal Opinion

Amato v. Pelligrini

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 13, 1990PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

246 N.J. Super. 34 (1990)

586 A.2d 856

EMILIO AMATO, PLAINTIFF,

v.

VINCENZO PELLIGRINI AND DORA PELLIGRINI, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Hudson County.

Decided March 13, 1990.

Spector & Dimin, P.A. By: Carl J. Mellone and William Dimin for plaintiff.

Maureen Schweitzer Parrott, Attorney-At-Law for defendants.

HORNSTEIN, J.S.C.

This is a complaint for dispossession of tenants pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A-18-61.1k — conversion of a residential apartment to a condominium unit.

The complaint was filed September 13, 1989, served September 20, 1989 and scheduled for hearing October 4,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carteret Properties v. Variety Donuts, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
  2. 447 ASSOCIATES v. MirandaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  3. Harry's Village, Inc. v. Egg Harbor TownshipSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  4. A.P. Development Corp. v. BandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  5. Riotto v. Van HoutenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jefferson Street Condominium Ass'n v. PaigeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
  2. 809-811 WASHINGTON STREET ASSO. v. GregoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
  3. Jijon v. CustodioNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API