Legal Opinion

Jijon v. Custodio

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 28, 1991PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

251 N.J. Super. 370 (1991)

598 A.2d 251

WILFREDO JIJON & MELIDA JIJON PLAINTIFF,

v.

IMMACULADA CUSTODIO AND FELIX CUSTODIO, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Special Civil Part, Hudson County.

Decided February 28, 1991.

Marcel R. Plaut, for plaintiff.

George Rios, for defendant.

HORNSTEIN, J.S.C.

This is a complaint to dispossess a residential tenant for violating the terms of a written lease, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:18-61.1 e.

Following the completion of plaintiffs' case, a motion was made to dismiss the complaint on the basis that defendants were no longer in violation of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bexiga v. Havir Manufacturing Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
  2. 447 ASSOCIATES v. MirandaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  3. Amato v. PelligriniNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Community Realty Management, Inc. v. HarrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  2. Muros v. MoralesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
  3. Housing & Redevelopment Authority v. MayoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
  4. Jersey City Management v. GarciaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API