Padgett v. McKissick
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
HALL, C.
This was an action by G. F. Padgett against W. H. McKissick, E. A. Shaw, and E. T. Baylock, doing business as the Peerless Supply Company. The action was for damages for personal injuries which the plaintiff received in a collision between a Ford truck driven by an employee of the defendants and a Are truck owned and operated by the city of Tulsa.
The case terminated on a demurrer to plaintiff’s evidence. Therefore, we must consider the facts in the case to consist of all the inferences and conclusions which may reasonably be drawn from the testimony introduced by plaintiff together…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Piper v. Adams Express Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- City of Tulsa v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Mark v. . FritschNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Ware v. SaufleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
- Texas Company v. RobbSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wachter v. McCuenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
- Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. McClearySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Martin v. McLainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Wray v. GarrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941