In re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. A-26961
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEYERSON, Judge.
This appeal is from an order entered in an adoption proceeding wherein the court ruled that the natural mother’s written consent to permit adoption of her two children was not the result of fraud, duress, or undue influence. The mother argues on appeal that (1) the evidence was insufficient to support the trial court’s ruling and (2) under Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 102 S.Ct. 1388, 71 L.Ed.2d 599 (1982), the burden of proof was on the adoptive parents to show by clear and convincing evidence that the consent was voluntary. However, we do not reach these issues…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In Re the Adoption of HolmanArizona Supreme Court · 1956
- Arizona State Department of Public Welfare v. BarlowArizona Supreme Court · 1956
- Anguis v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
- Powell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- J.D.S. v. FranksArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-4374Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- In re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Severance Action No. S-2462Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- Jared P. v. Glade T.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009